Skip to main content

How do you, as Product Owners, prepare for a Sprint Review?

Last post 03:52 am March 1, 2025 by Ian Mitchell
2 replies
09:23 pm February 28, 2025

In my current job, the Scrum Master's documented process on Confluence states that the PO is the one who accepts or rejects a User Story. As a new PO, I’m wondering how I can best prepare to make these decisions during the Sprint Review. What do you do to ensure you're confident in accepting or rejecting a User Story? Any advice or tips on how to approach this? I’d appreciate hearing from experienced Product Owners on how you handle this responsibility


11:35 pm February 28, 2025

As a Product Owner, you should not have to make this decision during a Sprint Review or at any other time.

Accepting a Product Backlog Item or Increment is not an accountability of the Product Owner Role. Developers are accountable for adhering to the Definition of done and creating usable Increments. The Product Owner should be able to communicate the Product Goal, the meaning and intent of Product Backlog Items, and the Sprint Goal to stakeholders, including Developers. The Developers should have the information they need to complete the Product Backlog Item and ensure that the Increment will be acceptable to the stakeholders receiving the product.

This doesn't mean that the Developers won't have questions or that the Product Owner shouldn't be the voice of the stakeholders. By doing the work, the Developers may realize they don't have all the details they need to complete the work and may turn to the Product Owner to help or answer questions. However, this should happen throughout the Sprint and not at the Sprint Review.

I would also highlight one Scrum Guide sentence: "The Sprint Review should never be considered a gate to releasing value." This extends to the Product Owner at the Sprint Review. If the Developers do not have the knowledge or information needed to understand the work and ensure product quality, they must gain those insights.


03:52 am March 1, 2025

The items selected in Sprint Planning are a forecast of the work needed to meet a Sprint Goal. The purpose of a Sprint Review is to update the Product Backlog with the work that remains to be Done. If the Product Owner accepts anything at all in a Sprint Review, it's that work is valuable, is not yet Done, and belongs on the Product Backlog.

During a Sprint,  once any work is Done the imperative is to put it to use. The Developers make this decision. A Product Owner could stop this from happening, if business condtions change rapidly and the increment would no longer add value. Otherwise, there is no excuse for putting empiricism in delay.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.