Skip to main content

Scrum Development Team - Adding 10th one.

Last post 05:44 pm June 21, 2016 by Arun Parameswaran Pillai
6 replies
11:27 pm June 18, 2016

I have a query on adding team members to scrum team. Trying to understand with an example.

"I am working in a health IT project team and need to deliver an increment as part of a Healthcare reform mandate. (product must go live without any delay to meet federal mandates)

There are 10 tasks in sprint backlog and all our Dev teams are fully engaged with that(say we have 9 folks working in that sprint). Suddenly we came across a critical technical issue which is not resolvable by our current DEV team. We think one person who is working with another team can help us to resolve (since he faced the issue before - assume he faced the issue when he was in another organization) but he also need some time to understand the developments to fix the issue. In this case can we borrow him as a 10th resource in our team?

I just want to give this example because, say current organization 'A' do not have any details/documentation of the particular issue.

Again, we need to consider him as an outside helper for the scrum team or another scrum member who has responsibilities of the product.

I think he may be considered as outside helper, but would like to know what is the difference between outside helper and 10th team member if he code from scratch or fix the issue in his own way?


03:25 pm June 20, 2016

Arun,

It is certainly permissible to arrange for subject matter experts outside of the team to provide assistance to the team. What is strongly suggested is that this "outside expert" not complete any work, but collaborate with 1 or more Development Team members on the solution.

It is important that the development team not accept any sprint work dependent upon the availability of the outside SME unless that SME has capacity to work with the team.

Adding them to the team is a poor option. It creates variability within the team, and reinforces silos of information within the organization.

Having them perform the work (code/test) is also a poor option, because it does not address the knowledge gap within the current Dev team.


04:30 pm June 20, 2016

> We think one person who is working with another team can help us to resolve

Is that other team working on the same healthcare reform product as your team?


11:17 pm June 20, 2016

Hi Lan. Thanks for looking into my query.

It can be another feature of same product (like benefit year process or calendar year process etc); but the other person is a Techie with all necessary technical skills and prior experiences.

But my question was more on the technical side. How to fix a technical issue in short period of time within the scrum frame work - by utilizing outside help.

So the 'responsible' development team member himself needs to correct the code with the guidance of external member or we can allow the other person to code and fix. This is the query I have.

Sorry, if the question not make sense!!!


11:22 pm June 20, 2016

Thanks Timothy for the help in understanding the concept. So its individual team member (who was responsible for that issue) needs to code and fix instead of having the other person to touch the code. That will be fruitful for self organization and cross-functional excellence as you advised.


04:39 pm June 21, 2016

If the requisite skills are to be found in another team working on the same product, then those teams should consider replanning their work instead of moving team members around. Variability in team structure is best avoided, as Tim has mentioned.


05:44 pm June 21, 2016

Thanks Lan. It makes sense.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.