Skip to main content

Sprint planning - client would like to add more important stories than the capacity allows. How to explain client that is not possible?

Last post 11:08 pm October 29, 2024 by Thomas Owens
2 replies
12:19 pm October 29, 2024

Hi All,

I have the following case:

My team consists of 3 developers and 1 QA. Sprint is 2 weeks or 10 working days. One of the developers will be working 7 days. I calculated that the sprint capacity is 296 hours - 4 people  8 hours per day = 32 hours -> or 3 people  80 hours/sprint = 240 hours + (1 dev * 56 hours/sprint). 

My question is how to calculate the estimated stories included in the sprint and how to explain to the client that it is not possible additional stories to be added to the sprint?

Thanks in Advance! 

Best Regards,

V


07:05 pm October 29, 2024

My question is how to calculate the estimated stories included in the sprint and how to explain to the client that it is not possible additional stories to be added to the sprint?

Why would you do that, and why would the client care?

The point of a Sprint is to meet a Sprint Goal which mitigates a significant risk or uncertainty. It's up to the Developers to estimate their Sprint capacity, so achievable goals can be identified and then accomplished.


11:08 pm October 29, 2024

Although potentially helpful for the team, the capacity estimations are not particularly relevant for communicating with the stakeholders.

The stakeholders must understand that the Developers and the Developers alone control what work goes into a Sprint.

The Product Owner, acting on behalf of all the stakeholders, is accountable for ordering the Product Backlog. All the stakeholders need to respect any of the decisions made by the Product Owner.

Sprint Planning can be viewed as a negotiation between the Product Owner, representing the various stakeholders, and the Developers. The Product Owner wants to maximize the team's value delivery throughout the Sprint. However, the Developers are under various constraints, including their time or capacity to take on work, their knowledge and skills (of the domain, the tools and technology, and the product under development), the quality and levels of technical debt in the product, and more. Figuring out what can be done and what makes the most sense to do is a key discussion at Sprint Planning.

The stakeholders should be more interested in the Sprint Goal, which represents the value proposition that the Developers are committing to achieving within the Sprint, and how that Sprint Goal moves the product closer to attaining the Product Goal. They should trust the Product Owner to represent their interests and balance the competing interests of various groups when collaborating with the Developers along the way.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.