Skip to main content

Question on Scrum Guide

Last post 08:18 pm March 6, 2017 by Sergiy Pshenychnyy
3 replies
07:01 am March 3, 2017

All,

 

I started going through Scrum guide and have a simple questions. The concept related to Product Owner says

"The Product Owner is responsible for maximizing the value of the product and the work of the Development Team.".

I agree with the first part and trying to understand the later one.  I understand that PO creates the PBI for team which gets added to sprint backlog.

But dev team also decides to pick spikes and  code refactoring items. Does PO agrees to these items (since these item doesn't add any value for PO) OR how does this happen?

Thanks,

Ank


09:50 pm March 3, 2017

The Development Team wholly own their Sprint Backlog, so they can decide to include work which they consider to be necessary even when its value is not apparent to the Product Owner.


05:15 pm March 5, 2017

they can decide to include work which they consider to be necessary even when its value is not apparent to the Product Owner.

Indeed. We faced this situation during a recent sprint (duration: 2 weeks).

A story was "upgrading Atlassian Confluence to its version 6". In the middle of the sprint, new version for Confluence "sub components" (PostgreSQL database, and some plugins) were released. So we added some sub-tasks in the Sprint Backlog, because it was impossible to anticipate this and so to create them during the Sprint Planning.


05:54 pm March 6, 2017

The Development Team decides on picking spikes and refactoring items for the Sprint even though the value of those items might not be understood by PO. But in order to have a meaningful communication within the team, some explanation for PO is needed.


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.