Skip to main content

Suggestion: probational forum membership

Last post 12:32 pm August 4, 2014 by Anonymous
5 replies
07:42 pm August 2, 2014

Might I suggest a probational entry level of forum membership, under which new postings must first be approved by a forum administrator before being listed? The recent spam problem is becoming a bit wearing.

Only once a few bona fide posts have been submitted, should a contributor be granted new member status and allowed to post as normal.


04:16 am August 3, 2014

Hi Ian

Agreed.
It would give the admin more work of course inspecting and adapting.
If the result is a forum with less spam then would work or at least reduce it.

Michael


08:37 am August 3, 2014

Another thing which I just suggested after flagging the spam, was to immediately terminate that user's account when the posting is so off-topic that it can't possibly be construed as being SCRUM or Agile-related - like getting fake driver's licenses.

It can get a little more difficult when people post an advertisement in disguise - for example, saying Product XYZ is a great Backlog management tool. But in those cases, if the poster goes overboard on the selling, a warning could be issued. If that user gets X number of warnings, s/he is out.


08:45 am August 3, 2014

Actually, regarding the advertisement postings, perhaps Scrum.org should capture and not post those and send the poster an advertising rate chart. Or scrum.org could have a Tools page and Services page. Could be chargable or not. Each of these could have a Reviews section, but things can get out-of-hand quickly (false reviews by the Tool or Service creator; false reviews by a competitor...).


12:52 pm August 3, 2014

On a funny note:
No one has asked the question, are Scrum.org certifications included in that list
or alternative B
Is this a question in the PSM exam and if so what is actual answer from the 30 fake documents in the list.
;-)


Anonymous
12:32 pm August 4, 2014

Hello All,

We would certainly agree that this recent issue has become a bit wearing and that it is unacceptable. We have already taken some measures to address this issue, but also plan to promptly elevate our level of action in response to this concern. In the interim, we thank you kindly for your great suggestions and also for maintaining a good sense of humor. :-)

Enjoy your day!


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.