Skip to main content

Questions: Nexus Sprint Backlog

Last post 07:18 am March 2, 2021 by Scott Anthony Keatinge
3 replies
09:16 pm February 25, 2021

Hello Experts,

I am studying the Nexus and have few questions to clarify.

Question 1: Does Nexus Sprint Backlog contains all the PBI's to deliver the Sprint Goal or only the PBI's that has dependencies across teams?

Question 2: Which backlog comes into existence first, is it Nexus Sprint Backlog or Sprint backlogs by individual teams?

My Understanding: Nexus Sprint Backlog is updated daily as a part of Nexus Daily Scrum, Nexus Daily Scrum is attended by NIT members only.

Question 3: Who is the owner of Nexus Sprint Backlog?

Question 4: Who manages Nexus Sprint Backlog?

 


06:10 pm February 26, 2021

1. Potentially either. It's the composite of the Nexus Sprint Goal and PBIs from the Sprint Backlogs of the individual Scrum Teams. What matters is that it highlights any dependencies and reveals the flow of work during the Sprint.

2. Why would their evolution need to be staged at all?

3, 4. The Nexus Guide says that the Nexus Sprint Backlog represents the work of the Nexus. It's theirs. No one else would own or manage it.

 


12:58 am February 27, 2021

Thanks Ian for the response.

Q1: If it is either, in that case i would follow what The Nexus Framework for Scaling Scrum book has clearly mentioned 'Only PBI's those have dependencies across Scrum Teams'.

Q2: 2021 Nexus Guide says 'A Nexus Sprint Backlog is the composite of the Nexus Sprint Goal and Product Backlog items from the Sprint Backlog of Individual Scrum teams.'. The word 'from' make it sound like Nexus Sprint backlog items are 'coming from' Sprint Backlog of Individual Scrum teams or 'inducted after' Sprint Backlog of Individual Scrum teams. Although the framework diagram in The Nexus Guide doesn't show where it sits (including 2018 version of Nexus Guide where the other Scrum components were shown exactly where it appears in the Nexus flow).

Q3/4: I understand Nexus Sprint Backlog (NSB) belongs to Nexus, but unlike simple Scrum where we have 1 team responsible for everything, in Nexus we have 3-9 Scrum Teams, thus the definition or the word 'their' become too wide to pinpoint who/ which team, specially in the case when each team has their own Sprint Backlog to manage. Although NIT is NOT responsible for delivery of integration but they are still accountable for all the integration work. Thus the Ownership of the NSB logically fall with NIT but the Management of NSB could be either with the Scrum team or NIT. But nothing is clearly written either in Nexus Guide or The Nexus Framework for Scaling Scrum book.

Please share your views on my understanding of Q2/3/4.


07:18 am March 2, 2021

The NSB is a composite of each teams SB; however, dependencies are identified first and then added to the NSB & SB possibly at the same time (SB might be a bit later as the PBIs have to be chosen by the teams before going into their SB).  

The NIT updates the NSB as part of their NDS at a minimum (remember that dependencies should be reported immediately once they have been identified).  

Major point to remember is that the NIT is made up from members of each team that meet the appropriate criteria for that specific Nexus event in time, meaning that the team members can be different for each event instance.  


By posting on our forums you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.

Please note that the first and last name from your Scrum.org member profile will be displayed next to any topic or comment you post on the forums. For privacy concerns, we cannot allow you to post email addresses. All user-submitted content on our Forums may be subject to deletion if it is found to be in violation of our Terms of Use. Scrum.org does not endorse user-submitted content or the content of links to any third-party websites.

Terms of Use

Scrum.org may, at its discretion, remove any post that it deems unsuitable for these forums. Unsuitable post content includes, but is not limited to, Scrum.org Professional-level assessment questions and answers, profanity, insults, racism or sexually explicit content. Using our forum as a platform for the marketing and solicitation of products or services is also prohibited. Forum members who post content deemed unsuitable by Scrum.org may have their access revoked at any time, without warning. Scrum.org may, but is not obliged to, monitor submissions.